| Antonio on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:35:13 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: <nettime> gentrification of hacking |
I am sure that many of your already read these articles or they know
them by heart
Nonetheless I feel like refreshing your memory:
http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-reviewed-papers/free-software-trajectories-from-organized-publics-to-formal-social-enterprises/
http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/debate/there-is-no-free-software/
Also, since "gentrification" is the key issue in here, I would like to
quote this passage from Blake in his review of Richard Smith (2003)
work which I think could fit the ongoing discussion:Â
"In actuality, networks may contain ubiquitous actants occupying fluid
positions, who like Deleuze and Guattari's (1987) 'journeymen' and
'monsters' operate in relation to mechanisms of control but also retain
lines of escape of their own. This can be illustrated by Neil Smith's
(1992) analysis of the position of artists in the gentrification
process. In the Lower East Side artists can be seen to have a
meditating influence in gentrification, since low rents and government
subsidy may attract them to an areas, raising its cultural image enough
to attract gentrification. Nevertheless they have a ubiquitous role in
this process, since rising prices may finally push many artists out of
the neighbourhoods and some may therefore support activities from
original residents resisting gentrification. At the same time however,
artists may benefit from new markets created by the gentrifiers,
leading to the presence of oppositional art in mainstream galleries. In
this sense artists can be seen to occupy a fluid position in the
networks linking gentrifiers with the established community. Thus they
may be seen as an example of the non-conforming identities described by
Star (1991: 39), in that they operate "between the categories, yet in
relationship to them"."
a.
2015-08-26 15:42 GMT+02:00 Florian Cramer <fcramer@pleintekst.nl>:
  When Stephen Levy wrote "Hackers" in 1984, his description of hacker
  culture and his write-up of the hacker ethic were, to a considerable
  part, based on Richard Stallman. Already in that year, Levy called
  Stallman the "last of the true hackers". Stallman created the GNU
  Project in the same year out of frustration of what had become - or how
  little had remained - of the original M.I.T. hacker culture.
<...>
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org